A Faithless King and a Faithful Prophet

In 1 Kings 22:1-28, Ahab plans to go to battle with the Syrians in order to re-capture Ramoth Gilead. He invites Jehoshaphat, king of Judah, to accompany him in an alliance of the northern and southern kingdoms of Israel. Jehoshaphat requests divine guidance prior to the battle (v.5) and 400 false prophets testify that Israel would be victorious over Syria.

Jehoshaphat requests additional prophetic testimony (v.7) and Ahab replies that there was “one man, Micaiah the son of Imlah, by whom we may inquire of the LORD” but he further explains his disdain for Micaiah, “But I hate him, because he does not prophesy good concerning me, but evil” (v.8).

As the narrative proceeds, Micaiah is the true prophet of God and his counsel, if properly heeded, would have spared Ahab on the field of battle. The section demonstrates several truths regarding the rejection of God’s word and the integrity of the true prophet of God.

The Rejection of the Word of God

  1. Ahab desired to only hear what he wanted to hear, not anything that would be considered negative or discouraging.
  2. Ahab’s messenger (v.13) pressured Micaiah to speak what Ahab wanted to hear.
  3. Ahab gladly received the word of the false prophets as it was the message he wanted (vv.10-12).
  4. Ahab silenced Micaiah through physical violence (v.24) and imprisonment (v.27).

The Apostle Paul dealt with something similar in his 2nd letter to Timothy. Paul charges Timothy to “Preach the word” in 2 Timothy 4:2 and then he gives reasons for the command. In verse 3, Paul writes, “For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers…”

The desire to hear only what we want to hear is nothing new; it was practiced by Ahab, was present in Paul’s day, and unfortunately, continues in the church today.

The Integrity of the True Prophet of God

  1. Micaiah was committed to speaking “whatever the LORD says” (v.14).
  2. Micaiah was committed to speaking the truth of God, not catering to the felt needs of his hearers (v.8).
  3. Micaiah was committed to speaking the truth, notwithstanding the overwhelming testimony of 400 false prophets (vv.10-12).
  4. Micaiah was committed to speaking the truth, notwithstanding the pressure to do otherwise (v.13).
  5. Micaiah was committed to speaking the truth, in spite of physical violence imprisonment.

 The Conclusion

We must guard our hearts and receive the entirety of God’s revealed word, not just those portions that make us comfortable. We must resist the tendency to find teachers that speak what we want to hear; instead, we ought to pursue those men, who like Micaiah the prophet, speak “whatever the LORD says” even when what the Lord says isn’t comfortable or popular.

Save